the poor are the ones who have no money

Seeing is about to get off work, the busy day will pass. And several times to sneak in, just landed browsing a few blogs, and did not write something, I feel very unworthy of their own hands. During this period of coming off work, I did not have any work on hand and I was quiet at heart. Then write a question I have thought for a long time, that is, what is the rich? What is poor?
According to the people's minds, we can say that there is no doubt that the rich are the people, the poor are the ones who have no money. If I say the same thing, then there is no point in writing this article. Because what I think, just the opposite of this view, I think: rich people are not necessarily the rich, not the poor people are not necessarily the poor!
Of course, the standard that we say is rich and moneyless is a broad concept. What do you say is rich? What is not money? This is not a good definition. Can you say I have 1 million, then I am rich? No, because you are a poor man more than a man with billions of assets. Can you say I am a moonlight family, then I am the poor? Can not, because you are still a rich man than begging along the street. So how to define the so-called money without money? I think, mainly in the mentality, in the sense of self. As long as you think, I am a very prosperous, very relaxed at hand, not short of money, then you are a so-called "rich man." If you think that I did not make enough money to spend, my life is a bit stretched, my own little bit of money is calculated with a bit of carelessness, I have to pull yellow, and I say you should think you are the so-called "poor" It's The reason why we should add the so-called two words means that the poor and the rich are relative as well as the long-winded point. The former so-called "rich man" is still the same as the tycoon, the rich man or the poor, and the latter so-called "poor man" Laid-off workers are still rich people by subsistence allowances.
Well, not to mention the dialectics of these ozone layers. My grand view is now launched: the poor are not poor, the rich are not rich. First give two examples of the rich let everyone take a look:
I know the principals of a well-known school. On the economic issue, it goes without saying that nature is very rich and it is a real so-called affluent man. But he was a workaholic, came to school in less than 5 o'clock in the morning, checked school work, checked students for self-study, and spent nine or 10 o'clock in the evening before going home from get off work. During his daytime at work, he listened to work reports, lectures, meetings and comrades to talk. Heads are constantly thinking about various issues such as strengthening the management of school education and teaching. He had no other hobbies, singing, playing chess, playing games, playing sports, playing cards, including women, and not interested in anything. In his eyes, there was only management re-management, authority and desire. Perhaps you will say that his only interest is work, work is his interest. you could check here | site web | the original source | his explanation | view | read this article | visit homepage | useful content | go now